Are men into Tgirls top or bottom?

[(deleted)]

This is an informal poll to see if guys into tgirls are dom/sub and top/bottom?

[(deleted)]

`Hmmm... depends on the girl and how we fit together. Each situation is unique to me just like each person is different. Looks like we'll just have to find out. Sorry that doesn't really give you a clear cut answer to tally.

[(deleted)]

`Personally, I like to be mutual with how we take care of each other. Being considerate is a big part of a healthy relationship.

[loverbrandi]

`well i would be interested to know the answer to this informal poll my self ? come on guys tell what you think ...

[(deleted)]

tgirls

top

[(deleted)]

`Actually I think it's important to understand ------ compatibility as relationships are also based on it. You clearly cannot be with a man who's a bottom and you yourself a bottom ts. Whether most of us know it or not, ------ity is very ambiguous and their exists many different ------ preferences. Understanding them is key to acceptance; you still have your occasional man or woman who isn't understanding of how a man can be a bottom and not feel emasculated. I would think our community would be above this ignorant nonsense, but I on the other hand do consider myself more of a top ts who is attracted to more so bottom men; though I am still very capable of being versatile.

[(deleted)]

transsexualsaurusces wrote: I would think our community would be above this ignorant nonsense, but I on the other hand do consider myself more of a top ts who is attracted to more so bottom men; though I am still very capable of being versatile.

I can't, for the life of me, understand how a girl could be top.
But then again, i also can't take any transgender person calling themselves "t r a n n y" very serious.

Also, i totally agree with Johnny.
A guy that is more interested in what's in my panties than in me as a person can ---- right off.
Normal physical attraction is fine but the majority starts out with questions like that.
I call it "the three line rule"
Most can keep it up for about three lines of chatting/mailing before discussing ---.

Edit: put some spaces in because the forum auto corrects to "transsexual"

[poisonismycure]

`Kiera, we can be "Top" easily: Riding or Reverse Cowgirl are two Top/Dom positions. It is also worth noting that all positions in The Kama Sutra and other books like it can be applied. To do so all that needs to be done is switch vaginal penetration for an*l penetration and vise-versa after S.R.S. and healing. I enjoy acts of intimacy with my partner. An open mind is a pre-requisite for any one interested in being with me. I don't want to be with someone who is a blind sheep following the herd as most (not all) who fit that mold are ignorant, and judgmental, and wouldn't understand my situation or me as a person. IMHO for a healthy relationship you need compatibility on many levels Common Interests, Morals/Ethics, ------ity (arguably one of the most highly complex aspects in a relationship), etc. etc.
This is just my opinion and I apologize in advance if I seem confrontational I assure you I am not. As my emotional tone can't be expressed through a computer screen and many assume a stance of aggression or hostility with conflicting viewpoints my current mood is more relaxed, contemplative and neutral.

[(deleted)]

poisonismycure wrote: `Kiera, we can be "Top" easily

Positions aren't the subject of discussion dear.
Though one could argue they do have something to do with it.

[(deleted)]

`Yeah I thread jacked this one didn't I?

[(deleted)]

keiratg wrote: transsexualsaurusces wrote: I would think our community would be above this ignorant nonsense, but I on the other hand do consider myself more of a top ts who is attracted to more so bottom men; though I am still very capable of being versatile.

I can't, for the life of me, understand how a girl could be top.
But then again, i also can't take any transgender person calling themselves "t r a n n y" very serious.

Also, i totally agree with Johnny.
A guy that is more interested in what's in my panties than in me as a person can f*ck right off.
Normal physical attraction is fine but the majority starts out with questions like that.
I call it "the three line rule"
Most can keep it up for about three lines of chatting/mailing before discussing ---.

Edit: put some spaces in because the forum auto corrects to "transsexual"





Clearly you're insecure with your identity and that's fine, it takes some of us a little longer to deal with it. I on the other hand could care less what people refer to me as because I love myself and I've accepted myself, I don't need the acceptance of others.


BTW T r a n n ysaurusces is an inside joke my cousin came up with, live a little.

[(deleted)]

transsexualsaurusces wrote: keiratg wrote: transsexualsaurusces wrote: I would think our community would be above this ignorant nonsense, but I on the other hand do consider myself more of a top ts who is attracted to more so bottom men; though I am still very capable of being versatile.

I can't, for the life of me, understand how a girl could be top.
But then again, i also can't take any transgender person calling themselves "t r a n n y" very serious.

Also, i totally agree with Johnny.
A guy that is more interested in what's in my panties than in me as a person can f*ck right off.
Normal physical attraction is fine but the majority starts out with questions like that.
I call it "the three line rule"
Most can keep it up for about three lines of chatting/mailing before discussing ---.

Edit: put some spaces in because the forum auto corrects to "transsexual"





Clearly you're insecure with your identity and that's fine, it takes some of us a little longer to deal with it. I on the other hand could care less what people refer to me as because I love myself and I've accepted myself, I don't need the acceptance of others.


BTW T r a n n ysaurusces is an inside joke my cousin came up with, live a little.








I think you are who you are. Believe what you believe. I can respect what both of what you two believe. The thing that I stress is that that ------ positions are [u]not a prerequisite for a relationship of caring and giving.

[(deleted)]

transsexualsaurusces wrote: Clearly you're insecure with your identity

I am very secure with my identity as a woman thanks.
It seems you are the one that is lost and has adapted a name we get called by clueless morons.
But that's fine, it just shows how you see yourself.
As a t r a n n y instead of a woman.

[(deleted)]

The goal here is to do what turns on your partner and then what you want.

[dominic87]

`I think that guys are rather top and dom but I think it is the thing about t-girls that they might have the power and capability of dominating a usually strong man. So it definetly is a mixture but I like being top and dom and treating the t-girl like my sissi. That's what I love